Oral solids · Contract manufacturing enquiry

Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets

Request manufacturing feasibility

Discuss third-party manufacturing with Walter Healthcare, India. Confirm the formulation, tablet presentation, packaging and project requirements for a product-specific quotation.

Catalogue reference
WH-1000
Composition and strength
Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered
Dosage form
Tablets
Indicative administration route
Oral
Therapeutic navigation area
Diabetes & endocrinology
Pharmacological class
Antidiabetic
Manufacturing stream
Non-beta-lactam

Catalogue details support an initial B2B discussion. Walter confirms the applicable unit, current licence scope, formula, target market and commercial feasibility before making a commitment.

Clinical reference

Mechanism and pharmacokinetics.

Explore the published evidence for the ingredients in Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets. Each reference identifies its source formulation and study context. Ingredient studies describe the named reference product; they do not establish the pharmacokinetics, clinical suitability or bioequivalence of this finished formulation.

How to read our product information and sources ↗

Additional ingredient references still to be verified: Myo-Inositol. The references below cover only the named ingredients.

Prescribing-label excerpts

Metformin Hydrochloride

Reference for: Metformin. Source presentation: tablet, extended release. Source route: oral.

Mechanism of action

Metformin is a biguanide that improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. With metformin therapy, insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plasma insulin response may decrease.

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption — Following a single oral dose of 1,000 mg (2x500 mg tablets) metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets after a meal, the time to reach maximum plasma metformin concentration (T max) is achieved at approximately 7 to 8 hours. In both single- and multiple-dose studies in healthy subjects, once daily 1,000 mg (2x500 mg tablets) dosing provides equivalent systemic exposure, as measured by area under the curve (AUC), and up to 35% higher C max, of metformin relative to the immediate-release given as 500 mg twice daily.

At usual clinical doses and dosing schedules of metformin, steady state plasma concentrations of metformin are reached within 24 to 48 hours and are generally <1 mcg/mL.

In a two-way, single-dose, crossover study in healthy volunteers, the 1,000 mg tablet was found to be similar to two 500 mg tablets under fed conditions based on equivalent C max and AUCs for the two formulations.

Single oral doses of metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets from 500 mg to 2,500 mg resulted in less than proportional increase in both AUC and C max.

Effect of food: Low-fat and high-fat meals increased the systemic exposure (as measured by AUC) from metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets by about 38% and 73%, respectively, relative to fasting. Both meals prolonged metformin T max by approximately 3 hours but C max was not affected.

Distribution — The apparent volume of distribution (V/F) of metformin following single oral doses of 850 mg metformin HCl averaged 654±358 L. Metformin is negligibly bound to plasma proteins. Metformin partitions into erythrocytes, most likely as a function of time.

Metabolism — Intravenous, single-dose studies in healthy subjects demonstrate that metformin is excreted unchanged in the urine and does not undergo hepatic metabolism (no metabolites have been identified in humans), nor biliary excretion.

Excretion — Renal clearance is approximately 3.5 times greater than creatinine clearance, which indicates that tubular secretion is the major route of metformin elimination. Following oral administration, approximately 90% of the absorbed drug is eliminated via the renal route within the first 24 hours, with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 6.2 hours. In blood, the elimination half-life is approximately 17.6 hours, suggesting that the erythrocyte mass may be a compartment of distribution.

Renal Impairment — Following a single-dose administration of metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets 500 mg in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment, the oral and renal clearance of metformin were decreased by 33% and 50% and 16% and 53%, respectively. Metformin peak and systemic exposure was 27% and 61% greater, respectively in subjects with mild renal impairment and 74% and 2.36-fold greater in subjects with moderate renal impairment as compared to healthy subjects [see Dosage and Administration (2.2), Contraindications (4), and Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Hepatic Impairment — No pharmacokinetic studies of metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets have been conducted in subjects with hepatic impairment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].

Geriatrics — Limited data from controlled pharmacokinetic studies of metformin HCl in healthy elderly subjects suggest that total plasma clearance of metformin is decreased by 35%, the half-life is prolonged by 64% and C max is increased by 76%, compared to healthy young subjects. From these data, it appears that the change in metformin pharmacokinetics with aging is primarily accounted for by a change in renal function [see Dosage and Administration (2) and Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].

Gender — In the pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers, there were no important differences between male and female subjects with respect to metformin AUC and t 1/2. However, C max for metformin was 40% higher in female subjects as compared to males. In controlled clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes, the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin HCl tablets was comparable in males and females. The gender differences for C max are unlikely to be clinically important.

Selected passages from the cited U.S. prescribing label. The studies concern the source product and populations named in each passage; they do not establish Walter-product bioequivalence, an approved indication, or the kinetics of another fixed combination. Tables and the full prescribing information remain available in the source.

Source: DailyMed: Metformin Hydrochloride — tablet, extended release

Reference accessed . Label revision: 2026-09-03.

Editorial development perspective

What deserves attention in this formulation.

These notes use the catalogue composition and presentation to frame a technical discussion. They are planning considerations, not tested properties or clinical findings for this product.

The clinical references on this page cover only their named ingredients. These development notes do not resolve the remaining clinical-reference gaps.

About these development notes and source limitations ↗

Balance tablet performance and processability

Listed presentation: Tablets.

Use early development batches to compare blend flow, compression behaviour, tablet strength and the appropriate release test. A harder tablet or a faster disintegration result is not, by itself, a complete product specification. Set priorities around the intended presentation, then check that the chosen process can reproduce them at the proposed scale.

Make the release target explicit

Catalogue wording: “SR”.

Define the intended release profile and its test method before choosing a coating, matrix or other formulation approach. Compare prototypes against that target and identify the formulation-specific evidence needed to assess exposure and food effects. A release abbreviation alone does not establish a duration of action, dosing interval or pharmacokinetic profile.

Translate the listed strength into a quantitative formula

Strength expressions in this entry include “500 mg”, “600 mg”.

Tie every stated ingredient amount to its intended dosage unit or measure, then distinguish that declared amount from the quantity of raw material needed for a batch. Record any assay or equivalence calculation in the formula. This gives development, purchasing and artwork teams the same strength definition without assigning a patient dose from the catalogue.

Suggested starting point

A practical starting point is to make the release target explicit. For this tablets brief, agree the target characteristics and a short set of measurable development questions before comparing prototypes or supplier proposals. Keep unresolved clinical claims outside the product specification until supporting evidence is available.

Discuss this product brief

Manufacturing & packaging brief

Plan the tablet presentation.

Use this preparation guide for Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets. These are the decisions to resolve with the technical team before a site, process and commercial scope are confirmed.

Presentation & formulation

Define release type, coating, scoring and any reference-product requirements. Keep each strength and presentation as a separate item in the brief.

Quality & technical transfer

Agree the product specification, analytical methods and applicable dissolution or disintegration requirements. Identify the formula and process information available for transfer.

Review the technical documents

Packaging configuration

Compare the proposed blister, strip or bottle with the formulation and its protection requirements. Specify tablets per primary pack and primary packs per carton.

Explore packaging options

Details to confirm for this record

Release presentation
The catalogue includes “SR”. Carry that designation into the RFQ and confirm the intended release specification and supporting evidence; a different release type needs its own assessment.
Full composition
Keep all named components and their individual amounts together in the specification. Ingredient substitutions, omissions and changed ratios require a separate formula and permission review.

Quantities, MOQ & lead time

For Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets, state the tablet count and finished-pack count, target market and reorder forecast. MOQ and lead time depend on the assessed formula, process, components, testing and project readiness; request those terms in writing.

Discuss this manufacturing brief

Explore the context

Build the right manufacturing brief.

Common questions

Before you request a quotation.

Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets

What is listed in the catalogue?

The catalogue lists Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered as tablets in its diabetes & endocrinology navigation area and non-beta-lactam manufacturing stream.

Is manufacturing availability confirmed?

No. Walter checks current facility permissions, formulation and equipment fit, testing, packaging and target-market requirements before written confirmation.

What do I need for a quotation?

Share the exact composition and strength, tablets presentation, target market, initial quantity, preferred pack and timing. Identify whether this is a new product, development brief or transfer.

The quotation must confirm MOQ, inclusions, prerequisites and lead time for the proposed product and site.

Can I change the pack or target market?

Include each proposed pack and country in the enquiry. Container compatibility, artwork, supporting stability evidence, permission scope and destination requirements need review for the requested configuration.

A catalogue record does not establish export registration or a shelf-life commitment.

How do I submit my enquiry?

Use the product-specific enquiry button to carry this composition and dosage form into the form. After a successful submission, a receipt reference confirms that your brief has been saved for review. Use the RFQ checklist to prepare the remaining details.

Technical document review

Which documents can I ask Walter to review?

Ask about manufacturing and packing records, specifications, analytical methods, Certificates of Analysis (COA), stability evidence, the Process Validation Protocol (PVP) and Process Validation Report (PVR). The wider checklist below covers supplier qualification, technical transfer and ongoing supply.

View the full document checklist 14 review areas
Site, licence and audit scope
Manufacturing licence, applicable product permissions, GMP certificates, Site Master File, supplier-qualification questionnaire and relevant audit responses.
Manufacturing, packing and batch release
Master Formula Record (MFR), master packing instructions, Batch Manufacturing Record (BMR), Batch Packing Record (BPR), reconciliation and authorised release records.
Process validation and continued verification
Process Validation Protocol (PVP), Process Validation Report (PVR), process performance qualification documents and continued process verification trends.
Equipment, facilities and utilities
Validation Master Plan (VMP), user requirements, DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ records, calibration and maintenance evidence for relevant equipment and utilities.
Cleaning, carryover and hold times
Cleaning Validation Protocol (CVP), Cleaning Validation Report (CVR), residue limits, recovery studies and applicable clean, dirty and process hold-time studies.
Specifications and analytical evidence
Specifications, Method of Analysis (MOA), Standard Testing Procedure (STP), Certificates of Analysis (COA), analytical validation, verification and method-transfer records.
Stability, packaging and transport
Stability protocols/reports, ongoing stability commitments, pack specifications, approved artwork, compatibility and applicable packaging or transport studies.
Development and technology transfer
Development report, technology-transfer protocol/report, gap assessment, control strategy, critical quality attributes and critical process parameters.
Quality reviews, investigations and changes
Product Quality Review (PQR) / Annual Product Review (APR), deviations, CAPA, change control, OOS/OOT trends, complaints, recalls and relevant SOP/training records.
Material suppliers and impurity risks
API/excipient supplier qualification, traceability, material COAs, relevant origin declarations and impurity risk assessments with supporting tests.
Sterile-product evidence, where applicable
Contamination Control Strategy (CCS), media-fill/aseptic simulation reports, sterilisation and filtration validation, environmental monitoring, sterility/endotoxin and container-closure integrity evidence.
Computerised systems and data integrity
Computerised-system validation, access controls, audit-trail review, backup/restore checks and relevant data-integrity procedures.
Market-specific regulatory support
Applicable dossier sections, API master-file/CEP support, bioequivalence or biowaiver evidence and Certificate of a Pharmaceutical Product (CPP/CoPP), where required and available.
Quality agreement and access arrangements
Quality/technical agreement covering responsibilities, release, changes, subcontracting, investigations, complaints, recalls, audits and document access.

Agree the list for the exact product, site, process, pack, market and project stage. QA confirms what exists, applies and may be shared; some records may require an NDA, redaction or controlled review. See document definitions and review guidance.

Important qualification

This B2B catalogue record is not proof of current approval or confirmation that Metformin 500 mg (SR), Myo-Inositol 600 mg Film Coated Bilayered Tablets is available for sale. It is not prescribing information or patient advice. Any Drugs Rules status, current approval, exemption, applicable unit, licence scope, formulation, claims, brand use, destination-market registration and commercial feasibility require documentary verification and Walter's written confirmation. Read the full regulatory disclaimer.

Composition and classification are taken from Walter's product catalogue. The manufacturing guide helps buyers prepare a technical brief. Clinical references, where shown, describe the cited product and study. Manufacturing guide updated .